Stories about African American philanthropists are important

In this TEDxCharlotte Talk, writer, Valaida Fullwood and photographer, Charles Thomas explain how the creation of their book, Giving Back, helped to re-frame portraits of philanthropists. Since publication in 2011, the book was named 10 Best Black Books of 2011 and received the prestigious 2012 McAdam Book Award, which recognizes “the most inspirational and useful new book for the nonprofit sector.”

 

Have you read Giving Back: A Tribute to Generations of African American Philanthropists, yet?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Philanthropy, Social Change | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Don’t Complain, Make Things Better

Sometimes grant administration can seem a bit dull.

Tina Roth Eisenberg’s 2013 SXSW talk about how to incorporate design and values-based living into your personal and professional life, is not.

She is the creator of Swiss-miss.com, Tattly, and Teux Deux App. The popular design blog has a growing audience of 1.3 million monthly unique readers from all over the world and was selected by The Times as one of the world’s Top 50 design blogs.

Posted in Philanthropy | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Can We Unlock Data in the Social Sector?

Nanodots; data storage
National Institute of Standards and Technology

 

Last week I spent two work days sorting through the 2010 Census data trying to find  census tract level data for population, income, and age within 15 municipalities. However, I quickly learned that the data I needed was contained within a data set that is not coded for use with limited statistical analysis software. So, I know how difficult it can be to access data and analyze it for practical application.

“The lack of interoperability between [data] systems leads to wasted time and frustration. Even those who are motivated to use data end up spending more time and effort on gathering, combining, and analyzing data, and less time on applying it to ongoing learning, performance improvement, and smarter decision-making.”

But, all hope is not lost. The 2013 Data Interoperability Grantmaking Challenge is charged with looking for groundbreaking ideas to help improve data in the social sector. As a recent GMN Blog post summarizes, “data and information are critical tools for making change in our world, but they are tools that are currently difficult to access and use.” If those in the social sector cannot use data in relevant ways to do their work, what is the value of the data existing?

Applications will be accepted online from March 4 through May 7, 2013, 11:30 AM PST. Each challenge winner will receive a grant of $100,000.

More information can be found at: http://www.marketsforgood.org/challenge/

 

 

Posted in Philanthropy, Social Change, Technology | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

What Does Hunger in America Look Like?

According to Feeding America‘s 2012 Hunger in America Report, 1 in 6 Americans live in a food insecure household. That equates to roughly 50 million people. And, 1 in 5 children live in a food-insecure home. This is a harsh reality that is finally making it into the limelight via due to Upworthy’s infographic shown below.

via Upworthy
Click to enlarge

I don’t know about you, but these statistics scare me. But, what frightens me even more is the suggestion towards the end of the infographic that simply donating a few dollars or volunteering your time is going to solve the problem. Pardon my outrage, but food insecurity is a complex wicked issue and there are no simple solutions. Why didn’t the infographic include suggestions such as comprehensive policy change, starting with passing a better Farm Bill, encouraging coordinated advocacy efforts and supporting equitable job creation?

As the film trailer of A Place At the Table highlights, “charity is a great thing, but it’s not the way to end hunger.”

 

 

Posted in Philanthropy, Social Change | Tagged , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Four More Years: The Day After Election Day

“I walked here to vote, but I don’t even know who to vote for. Like, I don’t even know all the candidates’ names “

-Overheard at the polling station

As the votes are tallied to confirm President Barack Obama’s re-election victory, I wonder what the next four years will look like for the United States. Will it be a place of  bipartisan collaboration, civility, and respect? Or, will it be a place of fear-mongering, misinformation, and dishonesty?

The optimist in me hopes that people and politicians alike, will put aside their personal biases and see that we are actually more inter-dependent than we admit to ourselves. And, I even hope that the next few years allow for less polarizing discussions about politics because I’m tired of the inflammatory commentary coursing through every news medium.

But, most of all I want all political parties and voter advocacy groups to make a more conscientious effort to educate and empower young voters. It was heartbreaking to be standing in line and hear a young woman express here confusion to selecting a candidate for President. She knew to vote, but she did not know whom to vote for. The look of bewilderment on her face when I responded that there were a variety of candidates to choose from, revealed her ignorance.

So, how did this happen? Seriously, how did it become possible for a voter to not know who all the candidates were and why she should vote for one of them?

 

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Philanthropy, Social Change | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

The Understated Importance of Privilege

Mark Hecker’s, Founder and Executive Director of Reach Incorporated, recent blog post on the Unsectored gave me pause.

However, as “data” and “impact” have become larger factors in funding decisions, a frightening selection bias is emerging.

It has become commonplace for funders – corporate, foundation, and individual – to require “proof” before any money is provided. Often, institutional funders will not even consider a request before an organization has been operating for a number of years. So, how is an organization supposed to survive those first few years? How can a great idea see the light of day without the support of the philanthropic community? To this point, the answer has been stated without question. Those in the philanthropic community often say, without reservation, that early organizations must “bootstrap it” or “start off with friends and family.”

Clearly, I still have a lot to learn about the nuisances of grant making. Each decision to fund or not to fund an organization is colored by an organization’s own experience and knowledge base. Hecker further explains, “that his [organization's] success is almost completely attributable to my own personal privilege,” but so often the philanthropy community does not acknowledge these intricacies. Because of this curious observers may assume that the grant making process is shrouded in a layer of secrecy or worse inexplicable luck. But, how can we be thoughtful and effective grant makers if we are not addressing this? Furthermore, why should the public or private donors continue to champion our causes if we’re not taking a critically assessing how and why organization’s succeed?

We are supposed to care about improving our communities and do the best we can to carry out the organization’s mission, right? But if we are not addressing the personal assumptions and expectations we as grant makers each have, what good are actually doing?

More specifically,

“How do we create a community where organizational success doesn’t require personal privilege?

As I continue to understand what personal privileges I benefit from, I realize that it’s a difficult task to take on. And for many people, they are still uncomfortable talking about their own privileges in an open and honest way. But, I sometimes I wonder if it is because we fear that acknowledging our own privilege means it may be challenged.

 

Related articles

Enhanced by Zemanta
Posted in Philanthropy, Social Change | Leave a comment